Mercedes-AMG GT SUV Debuts With 1,169 HP and 710 kW Charging

More

Global EV Sales Reach 2.15 Million in September as Europe Sets New Record

More

Tesla Roadster Revealed With Rocket Thrusters and 0–60 MPH in 0.81 Seconds

More

Peugeot E-T16 Concept is 816-HP Electric Hyperhatch Inspired by the 205 T16

More

Truemag

  • Electric Car News
  • Electric Car Reviews
  • Plug-in Hybrids
  • Technology
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • Charging Map




Tesla hit by class action over ‘dangerously defective’ Autopilot software

Tesla Inc. was sued by vehicle owners over claims its Autopilot AP2.0 feature is “essentially unusable and demonstrably dangerous” when engaged.

The suit details “Tesla’s deceptive rollout” of both the Standard Safety Features and its new Enhanced Autopilot, which were touted as safe and “stress-free” for the driver. Consumers report Tesla vehicles equipped with the new Autopilot AP2.0 “behaving as if a drunk driver is at the wheel,” according to the lawsuit, and the suit states that the automaker knew that its software was incapable of upholding its promises to purchasers.

Over-the-air updates were either not delivered, they claim, or degraded performance of their cars’ autopilots compared to the original version. It is said that 50,000 Model S cars are affected by the disputed updates.

The lawsuit, filed Apr. 19, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, states, “Unwittingly, buyers of affected vehicles have become beta testers of half-baked software that renders Tesla vehicles dangerous if engaged.”

According to the complaint, Tesla sold about 47,000 affected Model S and Model X vehicles in Q4 2016 and Q1 2017, and damages for each model would include the value of the standard safety features that do not exist in all the affected cars, plus the $5,000 premium cost of the nonfunctional Enhanced Autopilot feature that many customers also purchased

The lawsuit states that Tesla missed deadline after deadline that it gave purchasers. Regarding its Standard Safety Features which include automatic emergency braking, front collision warning, side collision warning and auto high beams, Tesla told consumers these features would be available by December 2016 and “roll out through over-the-air software updates,” but to date, only a dangerously defective Traffic Aware Cruise Control has actually come to fruition, according to the suit. The remaining features simply do not exist.

The lawsuit details accounts of three named plaintiffs who purchased affected Tesla vehicles for prices ranging from about $81,000 to $113,000. In each instance, when purchasers received their vehicles from Tesla, the Standard Safety Features and Enhanced Autopilot were non-functioning, despite Tesla’s website and marketing materials indicating that both features would be available in December 2016.

Tesla responded to the suit, slamming the credibility of the claims being made, stating:

“This lawsuit is a disingenuous attempt to secure attorney’s fees posing as a legitimate legal action, which is evidenced by the fact that the suit misrepresents many facts. Many of the features this suit claims are “unavailable” are in fact available, with more updates coming every month. We have always been transparent about the fact that Enhanced Autopilot software is a product that would roll out incrementally over time, and that features would continue to be introduced as validation is completed, subject to regulatory approval.

Furthermore, we have never claimed our vehicles already have functional “full self-driving capability”, as our website has stated in plain English for all potential customers that “it is not possible to know exactly when each element of the functionality described above will be available, as this is highly dependent on local regulatory approval.”  The inaccurate and sensationalistic view of our technology put forth by this group is exactly the kind of misinformation that threatens to harm consumer safety.”

Apr 21, 2017Blagojce Krivevski
Hyundai launches "Unlimited+” Subscription Program for Ioniq ElectricNissan LEAF Named One Of KBB’s "5 Best Electric Cars Under $40,000"
You Might Also Like
 
Tesla Motors Buying Michigan Auto Supplier
 
Tesla Semi Wins Massive 2,500-Truck Order as U.S. Electric Truck Market Enters New Phase
Blagojce Krivevski

Blagojce Krivevski is physicist and green technology lover. Keep in touch with Blagojce through his email, web site, Twitter, Linkedin, Facebook and Google+.

April 21, 2017 Electric Car Newstesla, Tesla class action, tesla motors
Follow Us
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-news
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • instagram
  • pinterest
  • rss
Recent News
FIAT Multiplina Concept Packs Four Seats Into a 3-Metre Electric Quadricycle
October 24, 2026
Electrify America Opens Its Largest Charging Station With 24 Chargers in Orlando
October 23, 2026
Bentley Torcal First Edition Unveiled With Exclusive Luxury Features
October 23, 2026
New BYD Seagull Starts Below $10,000, Adds Five-Minute Flash Charging
October 23, 2026
Electric Company Vehicles Could Create 344,000 EU Jobs by 2030 – study
October 23, 2026




About
ElectricCarsReport.com ElectricCarsReport.com is a website dedicated to pure electric vehicles and the full range of consumer information and tools about electric cars, green technology energy, and the environment.
Latest News
FIAT Multiplina Concept Packs Four Seats Into a 3-Metre Electric Quadricycle
October 24, 2026
Electrify America Opens Its Largest Charging Station With 24 Chargers in Orlando
October 23, 2026
Bentley Torcal First Edition Unveiled With Exclusive Luxury Features
October 23, 2026
Get in touch

Email: contact@electriccarsreport.com

Get new stories by email:
Archives
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-news
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • instagram
  • pinterest
  • rss
DMCA.com
© ElectricCarsReport.com | All Rights Reserved.