New Dacia Spring Gets More Space, Range and Technology

More

2027 Audi A2 e-tron Brings 401-Mile Range and £32,200 Starting Price

More

Kia EV3 GT, EV4 GT and EV5 GT Expand Kia’s Electric Performance Lineup

More

UK EV Sales Surge in August as Electric Cars Near 30% Market Share

More

Truemag

  • Electric Car News
  • Electric Car Reviews
  • Plug-in Hybrids
  • Technology
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • Charging Map




Tesla hit by class action over ‘dangerously defective’ Autopilot software

Tesla Inc. was sued by vehicle owners over claims its Autopilot AP2.0 feature is “essentially unusable and demonstrably dangerous” when engaged.

The suit details “Tesla’s deceptive rollout” of both the Standard Safety Features and its new Enhanced Autopilot, which were touted as safe and “stress-free” for the driver. Consumers report Tesla vehicles equipped with the new Autopilot AP2.0 “behaving as if a drunk driver is at the wheel,” according to the lawsuit, and the suit states that the automaker knew that its software was incapable of upholding its promises to purchasers.

Over-the-air updates were either not delivered, they claim, or degraded performance of their cars’ autopilots compared to the original version. It is said that 50,000 Model S cars are affected by the disputed updates.

The lawsuit, filed Apr. 19, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, states, “Unwittingly, buyers of affected vehicles have become beta testers of half-baked software that renders Tesla vehicles dangerous if engaged.”

According to the complaint, Tesla sold about 47,000 affected Model S and Model X vehicles in Q4 2016 and Q1 2017, and damages for each model would include the value of the standard safety features that do not exist in all the affected cars, plus the $5,000 premium cost of the nonfunctional Enhanced Autopilot feature that many customers also purchased

The lawsuit states that Tesla missed deadline after deadline that it gave purchasers. Regarding its Standard Safety Features which include automatic emergency braking, front collision warning, side collision warning and auto high beams, Tesla told consumers these features would be available by December 2016 and “roll out through over-the-air software updates,” but to date, only a dangerously defective Traffic Aware Cruise Control has actually come to fruition, according to the suit. The remaining features simply do not exist.

The lawsuit details accounts of three named plaintiffs who purchased affected Tesla vehicles for prices ranging from about $81,000 to $113,000. In each instance, when purchasers received their vehicles from Tesla, the Standard Safety Features and Enhanced Autopilot were non-functioning, despite Tesla’s website and marketing materials indicating that both features would be available in December 2016.

Tesla responded to the suit, slamming the credibility of the claims being made, stating:

“This lawsuit is a disingenuous attempt to secure attorney’s fees posing as a legitimate legal action, which is evidenced by the fact that the suit misrepresents many facts. Many of the features this suit claims are “unavailable” are in fact available, with more updates coming every month. We have always been transparent about the fact that Enhanced Autopilot software is a product that would roll out incrementally over time, and that features would continue to be introduced as validation is completed, subject to regulatory approval.

Furthermore, we have never claimed our vehicles already have functional “full self-driving capability”, as our website has stated in plain English for all potential customers that “it is not possible to know exactly when each element of the functionality described above will be available, as this is highly dependent on local regulatory approval.”  The inaccurate and sensationalistic view of our technology put forth by this group is exactly the kind of misinformation that threatens to harm consumer safety.”

Apr 21, 2017Blagojce Krivevski
Hyundai launches "Unlimited+” Subscription Program for Ioniq ElectricNissan LEAF Named One Of KBB’s "5 Best Electric Cars Under $40,000"
You Might Also Like
 
Tesla delivers 76,230 EVs in 2016, slightly below expectations
 
The NHTSA asked Tesla to recall 158,000 vehicles for touchscreen failures
Blagojce Krivevski

Blagojce Krivevski is physicist and green technology lover. Keep in touch with Blagojce through his email, web site, Twitter, Linkedin, Facebook and Google+.

April 21, 2017 Electric Car Newstesla, Tesla class action, tesla motors
Follow Us
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-news
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • instagram
  • pinterest
  • rss
Recent News
Mercedes-Benz VLE Now Available to Order With 4MATIC All-Wheel Drive
September 10, 2026
Mercedes-Benz Delivers First eActros 600 Electric Trucks to Amazon
September 10, 2026
Horse Powertrain B20 Is a Waterproof Hybrid Engine Built for Extreme Off-Roading
September 10, 2026
Polestar Formula 2030 Concept Previews New Polestar 2 and 7 Styling
September 9, 2026
Xiaomi Launches SkyNomad EREV SUVs in China
September 9, 2026




About
ElectricCarsReport.com ElectricCarsReport.com is a website dedicated to pure electric vehicles and the full range of consumer information and tools about electric cars, green technology energy, and the environment.
Latest News
Mercedes-Benz VLE Now Available to Order With 4MATIC All-Wheel Drive
September 10, 2026
Mercedes-Benz Delivers First eActros 600 Electric Trucks to Amazon
September 10, 2026
Horse Powertrain B20 Is a Waterproof Hybrid Engine Built for Extreme Off-Roading
September 10, 2026
Get in touch

Email: contact@electriccarsreport.com

Get new stories by email:
Archives
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-news
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • instagram
  • pinterest
  • rss
DMCA.com
© ElectricCarsReport.com | All Rights Reserved.