Nissan Ariya: UK pricing starts from £43,845 and the full line up available to order from July 5th

More

All-electric Citroen e-C4 X is four-door fastback with added SUV attitude

More

DS 7 E-TENSE arrives with revised look and new 360hp PHEV variant

More

Hyundai Unveils Design of All-Electric IONIQ 6, Electrified Streamliner with Mindful Interior Design

More

Truemag

  • Electric Car News
  • Electric Car Reviews
  • Plug-in Hybrids
  • Technology
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • Charging Map

Plug-in hybrids not as fuel-efficient as official figures claim, Which? reveals

Manufacturers are advertising unrealistic fuel efficiency figures for plug-in hybrid cars and potentially costing motorists hundreds of pounds more in fuel costs, according to new tests by UK consumer group Which?.

Which? tested 22 popular models and found they all fell well short of car makers’ claims, with the worst being 72 per cent less efficient than claimed and the ‘best’ still being 39 per cent below its official fuel economy rating.

Using this fuel consumption figure, average fuel costs (118.5p for petrol and 121.8p for diesel) and annual mileage of 9,000 (average travelled by respondents in Which? ‘s annual car survey), Which? calculated how much petrol or diesel would cost every year for each car. It compared this with annual fuel costs based on the manufacturer’s lowest average mpg claim.

Across all of the tests – which are tougher than official tests to better represent real-driving conditions – Which? found the cars were on average 61 per cent less fuel-efficient than the official fuel economy rating, meaning motorists could be paying on average £462 more a year in fuel costs.

Fuel consumption figures are an important factor for consumers when buying a plug-in hybrid vehicle. However, manufacturers’ fuel consumption figures – miles per gallon (mpg) – are calculated using the Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) and are based on a model’s electric driving range, among other factors. This means the mpg that can actually be achieved in real-world driving can be much lower and drivers could consume and spend more fuel than expected.

In one particularly bad case, the consumer champion found the BMW’s X5 plug-in hybrid was 72 per cent less efficient than official figures and could cost the owner £669 more a year in fuel costs. According to BMW, this model could cover 188.3 miles per gallon, but Which? tests found it could only cover 52.8 miles per gallon. Which? calculated, based on the manufacturer’s mpg, owners might expect to spend £258 on fuel annually, however, using Which?’s mpg figure, they would spend £927 a year.

BMW’s 2 Series Active Tourer was also 71 per cent less efficient than the manufacturer claimed. BMW claimed this model could cover 156.9 miles per gallon, but Which? tests found it could only cover 44.8 miles per gallon and would cost £1,081 a year to fuel. This is compared to £309 a year based on the manufacturer’s mpg – a £772.08 difference.

Which? also found Mercedes’ B-Class plug-in hybrid was 67 per cent less efficient than claimed. According to Mercedes, it could cover 256 miles per gallon, which means customers might only expect to spend £206 a year in petrol or diesel costs. But in Which?’s tests, it could only cover 78 miles per gallon, meaning fuel costs would be much higher than anticipated at £617 a year.

While the Toyota Prius was “best” among all the models tested, it was still 39 per cent less fuel efficient than official figures claim. Toyota claimed the mpg for its Prius model is 188.3 miles, however Which? tests found it was 114.4. Based on Toyota’s mpg, Prius owners might only expect to spend £257.62 annually on fuel, however using Which?’s mpg would likely spend £429.07 a year.

Natalie Hitchins, Head of Home Products and Services at Which?, said: A fuel-efficient plug-in hybrid vehicle is an attractive feature for prospective buyers, as many will expect to spend less on fuel and reduce their carbon footprint. Yet our research shows many hybrid models are not as efficient as the manufacturers claim, which means motorists could be spending more on fuel than they anticipated. It is clear that the standard set for calculating fuel consumption is flawed and should be reviewed to better reflect real-life driving conditions. This would ensure manufacturers advertise more accurate figures and consumers have a better understanding of how much they should expect to spend on fuel.

In response to the report, industry group Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) emphasised that the WLTP laboratory test was independently verified by government authorities, and consistently revealed that plug-in hybrids delivered significant emission reductions compared to pure fossil fuel vehicles.

“There will, however, always be a difference between lab tests and real-world use,” chief executive Mike Hawes said. “Fuel use will vary greatly depending on the type of journey made, the conditions, driving stye, load and other factors which is why the WLTP test is a standardised test designed to overcome these variables and provide consumers with accurate and comparable results across all vehicles.”

Mar 3, 2021Blagojce Krivevski
Honda e named ‘City Car of the Year’ in the UKCOTY Awards 20215-star Euro NCAP safety rating for Polestar 2
You Might Also Like
 
Demand drives used values for small electric vehicles
 
UK: Used car buyers double up on electric vehicles as market grows 5.1%
Blagojce Krivevski

Blagojce Krivevski is physicist and green technology lover. Keep in touch with Blagojce through his email, web site, Twitter, Linkedin, Facebook and Google+.

March 3, 2021 Electric Car News, Plug-in Hybridsphev, plug-in hybrid, Plug-in Hybrids, UK, Which
Follow Us
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-news
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • instagram
  • feedburner
Recent News
1200 Units of BYD YUAN PRO EVs Hit the Market in Costa Rica
July 3, 2022
Tesla delivered 254,695 EVs in the Q2 of 2022
July 3, 2022
Production of the BMW i3 comes to a close with an anniversary and the exclusive HomeRun Edition
July 2, 2022
NIO announces EV deliveries for June and Q2 2022 deliveries
July 2, 2022
Volvo Cars gears up for long-term sustainable growth with new Slovakia EV manufacturing plant
July 1, 2022
About
ElectricCarsReport.com ElectricCarsReport.com is a website dedicated to pure electric vehicles and the full range of consumer information and tools about electric cars, green technology energy, and the environment.
Latest News
1200 Units of BYD YUAN PRO EVs Hit the Market in Costa Rica
July 3, 2022
Tesla delivered 254,695 EVs in the Q2 of 2022
July 3, 2022
Production of the BMW i3 comes to a close with an anniversary and the exclusive HomeRun Edition
July 2, 2022
Subscribe

Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest news and event postings.

Get in touch

Email: [email protected]

Archives
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-news
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • instagram
  • feedburner
DMCA.com
2021 © ElectricCarsReport.com | All Rights Reserved.